Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    [mc4wp_form id=3515]
    What's Hot

    Name That Toon: Last Line of Defense

    April 16, 2024

    OpenJS Foundation Targeted in Potential JavaScript Project Takeover Attempt

    April 16, 2024

    Middle East Cyber Ops Intensify, With Israel the Main Target

    April 16, 2024
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    AI Home SecurityAI Home Security
    • Home
    • Home Security
    • Cyber Security
    • Biometric Technology
    Contact
    AI Home SecurityAI Home Security
    Home»Cyber Security»Discover How Gcore Thwarted Powerful 1.1Tbps and 1.6Tbps DDoS Attacks
    Cyber Security

    Discover How Gcore Thwarted Powerful 1.1Tbps and 1.6Tbps DDoS Attacks

    justmattgBy justmattgDecember 3, 2023No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    [ad_1]

    Dec 01, 2023The Hacker NewsNetwork Security / Cyber Attack

    DDoS Attacks

    The most recent Gcore Radar report and its aftermath have highlighted a dramatic increase in DDoS attacks across multiple industries. At the beginning of 2023, the average strength of attacks reached 800 Gbps, but now, even a peak as high as 1.5+ Tbps is unsurprising. To try and break through Gcore’s defenses, perpetrators made two attempts with two different strategies. Read on to discover what happened and learn how the security provider stopped the attackers in their tracks without affecting end users’ experiences.

    A Powerful DDoS Attacks

    In November 2023, one of Gcore’s customers from the gaming industry was targeted by two massive DDoS attacks, peaking at 1.1 and 1.6 Tbps respectively. The attackers deployed various techniques in an unsuccessful attempt to compromise Gcore’s protective mechanisms.

    Attack #1: 1.1 Tbps UDP-based DDoS

    In the first cyber assault, the attackers sent a barrage of UDP traffic to a target server, peaking at 1.1 Tbps. Two methods were employed:

    • By using random UDP source ports, they hoped to evade conventional filtering mechanisms.
    • The attackers concealed their genuine identity by forging source IP addresses.

    This was a classic flood (or volumetric) attack, whereby the attackers hoped to consume all available bandwidth of or to a data center or network, overwhelming the target servers with traffic and making them unavailable to legitimate users.

    The graph below shows customer’s traffic during the attack. The peak of 1.1 Tbps shows an aggressive but short-lived attempt to flood the network with data. The green line (“total.general.input”) shows all inbound traffic. The other colored lines on the graph represent the network’s responses, including measures to filter and drop malicious traffic, as the system manages the deluge of data.

    Line graphs showing a spike in a Gcore customer's network traffic, peaking at 1.1 Tbps, indicative of a substantial DDoS attack
    The attack comprised a short but intense peak of 1.1 Tbps around 22:55

    Attack #2: 1.6 Tbps TCP-based DDoS

    Graph of nine-hour attack with consistent traffic volume of 700 Mbps and peak of 1600 Mbps at the onset
    The attack’s consistent traffic volume was 700 Mbps and at the onset peaked at 1600 Mbps

    This time, the attackers attempted to exploit TCP protocol with a mix of SYN flood, PSH, and ACK traffic.

    In a SYN flood attack, several SYN packets are delivered to the target server without ACK packets. This means the server generates a half-open connection for each SYN packet. If successful, the server will ultimately run out of resources and stop accepting connections.

    The PSH, ACK phase of the attack rapidly sends data to the target system. The ACK flag signals that the server received the previous packet. This pushes the system to handle data promptly, wasting resources. A SYN flood assault using PSH, ACK packets is harder to defend against than a SYN flood, since the PSH flag causes the server to process the packet contents immediately, consuming more resources.

    As before, the goal was to overload the customer’s servers and make their services inaccessible to authorized users. This SYN flood had a peak volume of 685.77 Mbps and the PSH, ACK had a magnitude of 906.73 Mbps.

    Gcore’s Defensive Strategies

    Gcore’s DDoS Protection effectively neutralized both attacks while preserving regular service for the customer’s end users. The general approach of fending off DDoS security threats includes several techniques, such as Gcore’s front-line defenses:

    • Dynamic traffic shaping: Dynamically adjusted traffic rates effectively mitigate the impact of the attack while ensuring the continuity of critical services. In order to prioritize genuine traffic while slowing harmful transmissions, adaptive thresholds and rate restrictions are used.
    • Anomaly detection and quarantine: Models based on machine learning analyze behavior to identify anomalies. When an anomaly occurs, automated quarantine mechanisms redirect erroneous traffic to isolated segments for additional analysis.
    • Regular expression filters: To block malicious payloads without disrupting legitimate traffic, regular expression-based filter rules are implemented. Their continuous fine-tuning ensures optimal protection without false positives.
    • Collaborative threat intelligence: Gcore actively engages in the exchange of threat intelligence with industry peers. Collective insights and real-time threat feeds guide Gcore’s security techniques, allowing a rapid response to developing attack vectors.

    By employing these strategies, Gcore was able to effectively mitigate the impact of DDoS attacks and protect their customer’s platform from disruption, negating potential reputational and financial losses.

    Conclusion

    DDoS attacks of 1.5+ Tbps volume pose an increasing danger across industries, with attackers using imaginative techniques to try and bypass protection services. Over the course of 2023, Gcore has registered increases in both average and maximum attack volumes, and these two connected attacks demonstrate that trend.

    In the attacks covered in the article, Gcore was able to prevent any damage through a combination of dynamic traffic shaping, anomaly detection, regular expression filters, and collaborative threat intelligence. Explore DDoS Protection options to secure your network against ever-evolving DDoS threats.

    Found this article interesting? Follow us on Twitter  and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.



    [ad_2]

    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleChinese Hackers Using SugarGh0st RAT to Target South Korea and Uzbekistan
    Next Article WhatsApp’s New Secret Code Feature Lets Users Protect Private Chats with Password
    justmattg
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Cyber Security

    Name That Toon: Last Line of Defense

    April 16, 2024
    Cyber Security

    OpenJS Foundation Targeted in Potential JavaScript Project Takeover Attempt

    April 16, 2024
    Cyber Security

    Middle East Cyber Ops Intensify, With Israel the Main Target

    April 16, 2024
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Demo
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    Cyber Security

    Name That Toon: Last Line of Defense

    justmattgApril 16, 2024

    [ad_1] The enemies are always getting closer, using the same advanced technologies as security pros…

    OpenJS Foundation Targeted in Potential JavaScript Project Takeover Attempt

    April 16, 2024

    Middle East Cyber Ops Intensify, With Israel the Main Target

    April 16, 2024

    Muddled Libra Shifts Focus to SaaS and Cloud for Extortion and Data Theft Attacks

    April 16, 2024

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    [mc4wp_form id=3515]
    Demo
    Top Posts

    Name That Toon: Last Line of Defense

    April 16, 2024

    OpenJS Foundation Targeted in Potential JavaScript Project Takeover Attempt

    April 16, 2024

    Middle East Cyber Ops Intensify, With Israel the Main Target

    April 16, 2024
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Latest Reviews
    Cyber Security

    Name That Toon: Last Line of Defense

    justmattgApril 16, 2024

    [ad_1] The enemies are always getting closer, using the same advanced technologies as security pros…

    Cyber Security

    OpenJS Foundation Targeted in Potential JavaScript Project Takeover Attempt

    justmattgApril 16, 2024

    [ad_1] Apr 16, 2024NewsroomSupply Chain / Software Security Security researchers have uncovered a “credible” takeover…

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    [mc4wp_form id=3515]
    Demo
    MOST POPULAR

    Name That Toon: Last Line of Defense

    April 16, 2024

    California mountain lion P-22 left mark on wildlife conservation

    January 1, 2023

    Congress Again Writes To Home Minister Amit Shah Over Rahul Gandhi’s Security

    January 1, 2023
    OUR PICKS

    Name That Toon: Last Line of Defense

    April 16, 2024

    OpenJS Foundation Targeted in Potential JavaScript Project Takeover Attempt

    April 16, 2024

    Middle East Cyber Ops Intensify, With Israel the Main Target

    April 16, 2024

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    [mc4wp_form id=3515]
    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    AI Home Security © 2025 All rights reserved | Designed By ESmartsSolution

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    ↑